Fair Use Notice: This site may contain some copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of vital issues which already exist in the public domain. – Note: These links are posted at the top of the page as the week progresses. Links from previous weeks can be found under the “Current Quicklinx” button.
What Can Be Done to Prevent DNA-Sized Plastics From Invading Our Bodies? – by Amy Denney – https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/can-the-un-keep-dna-sized-plastics-from-invading-our-bodies-5638579 – “Plastics that break down into particles as tiny as our DNA—small enough to be absorbed through our skin—are released into our environment at a rate of 82 million metric tons a year. These plastics, and the mix of chemicals they are made with, are now major contributors to disease, affecting the risk of afflictions ranging from cancer to hormonal issues… Plastic pollution threatens everything from sea animals to human beings, a problem scientists, activists, business groups, and politicians are debating as they draft a global treaty to end plastic pollution. These negotiations have only highlighted the complexity of a threat that seems to pit economic growth and jobs against catastrophic damage to people and the planet… Rapid growth in plastics didn’t begin until the 1950s, and since then, annual production has increased nearly 230-fold, according to two data sets processed by Our World in Data. More than 20 percent of plastic waste is mismanaged—ending up in our air, water, and soil… Inescapable Problem – While plastic doesn’t biodegrade—at least not in a reasonable time frame—it does break down into ever smaller particles. We may no longer see it, but plastic constantly accumulates in our environment. These microscopic bits, known as microplastics and nanoplastics, can enter our bodies through what we eat, drink, and breathe… Microplastics measure five millimeters or less. Nanoplastics are an invisible fraction of that size, down to one billionth of a meter or around the size of DNA… While microplastics can be as small as a hair, they remain visible. Nanoplastics, however, are impossible to see without a microscope… Plastic pollution is a chemical remnant of petroleum with other chemicals added in to change the durability, elasticity, and color. PlastChem Project has cataloged more than 16,000 chemicals—4,200 considered highly hazardous, according to the initiative’s report issued in March… The astounding level and types of plastics, many with unknown health effects, should be a wakeup call for everyone, Erin Smith, vice president and head of plastic waste and business at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), told The Epoch Times… ‘Plastic pollution is absolutely everywhere,’ she said. ‘What’s hard right now is the body of science, trying to understand what the presence of plastic inside us means from a human health perspective, is still new.’.. Ms. Smith said we may be waiting for the science to reveal the full scope of plastic’s biological effects, but one thing is certain: ‘We know it’s not good.’.. Reproductive and Neurological Issues – Newer human health studies have shown plastic has far-reaching effects… ‘“The research is clear: Plastics cause disease, disability, and death. They cause premature birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth as well as leukemia, lymphoma, brain cancer, liver cancer, heart disease and stroke. Infants, children, pregnant women, and plastics workers are the people at greatest risk of these harms. These diseases result in annual economic costs of $1.2 trillion,’ said Dr. Phil Landrigan, pediatrician and environmental health expert, in a Beyond Plastics news release in March… Beyond Plastics, an advocacy group for policy change, warns that new research indicates plastic could be leading to an increased risk of heart disease, stroke, and death… Successive studies have found microscopic plastic particles affect every system of our bodies and at every age… Nearly 3,600 studies indexed by the Minderoo Foundation have detailed the effects of polymers and additives like plasticizers, flame retardants, bisphenols, and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances. The vast majority of studies indicate plastics affect endocrine and metabolic function, the reproductive system, and contribute to mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopment issues… One study published in Environmental Science & Technology looked at plastic food packaging from five countries and found hormone-disrupting chemicals were common… ‘The prevalence of estrogenic compounds in plastics raises health concerns due to their potential to disrupt the endocrine system, which can, among others, result in developmental and reproductive issues, and an elevated risk of hormone-related cancers, such as breast and prostate cancer,’ the authors noted… The full scope of these chemical consequences is far from known. According to Minderoo, less than 30 percent of more than 1,500 plastics chemicals have been investigated for human health impacts. That includes the “substitution” chemicals used to replace additives that were restricted after being found problematic… ‘All new plastic chemicals should be tested for safety before being introduced in consumer products, with ongoing post-introduction monitoring of their levels in human biospecimens and evaluation of health effects throughout the lives of individuals and across generations,’ said professor Sarah Dunlop, Minderoo Foundation’s head of plastics and human health… Absorbed Into Arteries and Skin – The relatively recent discovery that plastic particles can make their way into the human body through multiple methods has come with other unsetting insights. Microplastics and nanoplastics in human artery wall plaque were recently linked to a 350 percent increased risk of heart attack, stroke, and death… How to Stop the Plastic Onslaught – Since cleaning up plastic is nearly impossible once it breaks down, advocacy groups are pushing for legislation that would reduce single-use products such as food wrappers, bottles, takeout containers, and bags—some of the most prolific and problematic plastics… The United Nations Environment Programme, a global environmental decision-making body with representatives from all UN member states, decided in March 2022 that the plastics issue needed a coordinated response. It committed to fast-tracking a treaty meant to address the world’s growing plastic problem… However, after holding the fourth of five sessions in late April in Canada, the group still hasn’t decided whether to identify problematic plastics or call for new plastic to be phased out or scaled back. The final meeting begins in late November with a treaty expected in 2025.” – (More in original article <Behind a Paywall> – Paste link into site https://www.removepaywall.com/ to get access)
“Soylent Green” When A Conspiracy Becomes Truth. (Hidden Truth From Hollywood Series # 5) Forever Is A Long Time. That Deck Was Stacked Against Us. – by Anthony Blake – https://satorisecrets.substack.com/p/soylent-green-when-a-conspiracy-becomes – “I had a few people contact me early on after I started my Substack and asked me how controversial I was going to be with my subject matter, and did I think anything really conspiratorial was going to hurt my credibility as a writer, or taint my perspective for future articles? I laughed. I only had a couple of hundred views at the time on my earlier articles and I told myself when I started my Substack that I was going to go after truth and substance over quantity. I’m writing about topics that interest me and that I think will stimulate my readers. I’m as honest and forthcoming as I can be with my research and being as truthful as the material will allow
- Cell Culture Isolation.
- Transmission Electron Microscopy.
- Antibodies.
- PCR.
- Proteomics.
- Full Genome sequencing.
To date, we have conducted over 90 cell culture control studies. These cultures were not inoculated with a “virus” sample and consist only a cell line, antibiotics and fetal bovine serum (FBS). Despite the lack of a “virus” sample, cytopathic effect (CPE or cell death that is supposed to denote the presence of a virus) was observed in all 90 cell cultures… For an in-depth explanation of CPE and the isolation process see this article: Virus Isolation – Confusion is the Best Tool to Keep People from Truth… We took note of some of the main issues that people had raised concerning the cell culture control experiments carried out by Dr. Lanka, such as “overgrown” cell lines, and looked to address these in our control experiments… As such, and in an effort to strengthen the findings as much as possible, our control experiments cover every single angle of the methodology cross referencing the standard protocol for handling cell cultures at every stage as provided by the ATCC. We also used the most robust cell lines (HEK293T) and the least harsh antibiotics of Pen/Strep. Finally, we sought objective verification of CPE occurring in these cultures by using Laser Spectrometry and specific cell viability machinery called Countess. Countess allowed us to gain objective verification in the form of percentage read outs of the extent of the CPE in all the cell cultures… Figure 1 below shows one culture featured in the experiment. Note the clear cell apotosis (cell death) at just day 4 post removal of FBS nutrients… Countess registered up to 44% cell death which is an indication of CPE and sufficient to denote the presence of a “virus”. Remember that these CPE is taking place without the possibility of a “virus” being present in the culture… Also note the increasing CPE left to right as the amounts of antibiotics (Pen/Strep) added increases as per ATCC protocols…To act as a kind of “Positive Control” we added sputum from a healthy human as a sample into quite a few of our cultures to see if that affected the amount of CPE that took place… As you can see the amount of CPE registered by Countess was almost identical, if not a little lower, than was registered in the cultures to which no sputum sample was added… This is further proof that the CPE in these cultures is only caused by the removal of the FBS nutrients and the addition of antibiotics in accordance with the industry standard recommended dosages… We sent these cultures to an independent accredited Contract Research Organization (CRO) to do Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) on the control cultures. The CRO positively identified “Sars Cov2”, “HIV” and “Measles” from the electron micrographs taken of the cultures… We commissioned the CRO to look for Extra Cellular Vesicles which they positively identified as shown in Figure 3 below. Note they are empty, misshapen and much larger than most “viruses” at 2 000 nm… By cross referencing of size, shape and inclusions with the CDC version of SARS Cov 2 (in red square in Figure 4) we positively identified “Sars Cov 2” in our culture (refer to Figure 5). Note the round shape and the same inclusions inside at exactly the same size of 120 nm… By cross referencing of size, shape and inclusions with the CDC version of HIV (refer to Figure 7 with two red arrows) we positively identified “HIV” in our culture (refer to Figure 6). Note the same round shape, the same “nucleus” type inclusion and exactly the same size at 80nm… By cross referencing of size, shape and inclusions with the CDC version of Measles (refer to Figure 8) we positively identified “Measles” in our culture (refer to Figure 9). Note the same oval shape, the exact type of inclusion in the form of dotted proteins and phosproteins and exactly the same size, large at 250 nm… All of these were found within just 9 images of our culture. Funds prohibited us from taking out a package that enabled us to have a live session under the microscope with the CRO. We have no doubt that if we could purchase a package that gives us more images with control over where to look, we could find every single “virus” known to man in impeccable detail… We need your help – Up until this point we have kept these experiments private and mostly funded them ourselves… The next stage of the control experiment is genetics, PCR and Full Genome Sequencing… To fully understand what is going on with the PCR if not for “viral genetics” we need to do the following:
- Purchase a QPCR machine and some additional equipment.
- Send the samples to CROs for Full Genome sequencing.
- Carry out a more comprehensive TEM.
So, we are opening up to people power. We would be extremely grateful for any help to continue these vital experiments.
In return we want to give you something for your kind donations.
When we have obtained all of the results possible, we will do a full writeup of all methodologies, equipment, a materials list, and all guidelines we followed to be able to provide an information pack that everyone and anyone can have and access. Also, with this information pack we will release a video explaining these results, how they may be replicated and most importantly how they may be used… We have consulted with our lawyers who confirmed that, if we OpenSource these experimental results anyone can take them as their own and use them in their own capacity… A large part of why we are doing these experiments is to protect ourselves and loved ones if they ever try to repeat 2020. This information pack (scientific document) can be served to employers/schools/international borders etc. This is to counter the absolute nonsense if they try to enforce vaccine mandates or testing/masking policies… There have been many legal precedents set by Dr. Lanka, Marvin Haberland and others with wins in court based upon the truth of “No Virus”. We hope to be legally and scientifically prepared for the next time… Some articles relevant to the project as follows:
- Virus Isolation – Confusion is the Best Tool to Keep People from Truth
- The Most Detailed Controls Ever Published
- Virology – A Pseudoscience Like No Other
- An Update on Virus Isolation
- Virology – The Damning Evidence
- Virus Lie – The Result of 4 Years of Study“